Search for: "STUDIO ONE, INC." Results 421 - 440 of 741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am by Eric
* LA Times: Are movie studios souring on Facebook advertising? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by John Elwood
As for new relists this week, we have but one. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am by thelawprofessor
Despite  this disclaimer, the plaintiff apparently claimed that Christie’s had knowledge of numerous duplicate items that Paramount (studio creating Star Trek) was warehousing and which never appeared on the show. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:57 pm by Tom B
I suspect that if you had spend 20 odd years building a Trademark to brand your studio and games, and paid to have a Trademark registered, you might also feel compelled to enforce your trade name. [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 1:03 pm
The leading caselaw discussion of the DRM question is probably Universal City Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
The Walt Disney Company announced its plan to acquire Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:21 pm
The business is Factum, Inc. at www.factumonline.com. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
McAnnulty, 187 U.S. 94, 106 (1902) (government may not decide that one side of medical controversy, such as the benefits of smallpox vaccination or homeopathy, is “fraudulent”); Universal City Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm by Aaron Moss
The studio settled quietly out of court, so there’s no reported decision in this one. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Howard Knopf
I was involved in one of the first landmark Canadian decision, namely BMG Canada Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC - Federal Circuit says ‘declaratory judgment jurisdiction’ even if patent holder’s notice avoids phrases like ‘infringement’ and ‘assertion’ (Patents4Life) Except as provided elsewhere, or trumped, I’ll own all the IP – Delaware Chancery Court reminds of risks of wholesale incorporation by reference between separate IP agreements and judicial misreading of patent law: Cepahlon v Johns Hopkins (ISinIP) … [read post]