Search for: "Shapiro v. Doe"
Results 421 - 440
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 5:20 am
At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief filed by Cato in Marek v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
To what extent, if at all, does this link enable us to examine the many ways we perceive law as an art of story-telling? [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
At the Cato Institute’s blog, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato recently filed inWoollard v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Sekhar v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Sekhar v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:24 pm
Courts have court defined the term in the cases of Shapiro v Glens Falls Ins. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
“Legal” custody or decision-making power does not matter. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
But the ITC does not allow Apple to make and keep iOS unique. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:46 pm
”) (citing Shapiro v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Ilya Shapiro reports on the amicus briefs filed on behalf of the Cato Institute in Kaley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
Or, as my fellow tax attorney David Shapiro tweeted earlier today: You can read my initial thoughts on Windsor here and you can read my thoughts on its sister case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart has a write-up of the decision, as does Walter Olson at Overlawyered, in an expanded take on an earlier post he wrote for Cato @ Liberty. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Sophia Cole of The Cato Institute summarize an amicus brief they recently filed in McCutcheon v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
But they should not be obligated to do so.Lemley-Shapiro paper promotes Google's preferred arbitration method and reflects unconcealed anti-Apple, anti-Microsoft biasTwo well-known California professors, Stanford's Mark Lemley (patent law) and Berkeley's Carl Shapiro (competition economics), have published a pro-Google policy paper on FRAND rate-setting styled as an academic working paper, entitled "A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents". [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am
For example, the book includes excerpts written by John Roberts, Timothy Bishop, Stephen Shapiro, and David Frederick. [read post]
2 May 2013, 7:42 am
Shapiro & Associates, issued on April 26. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:43 am
Does the head of internal audit attend your company's board meetings? [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm
Lemley & Carl Shapiro (proposes that if standard-essential patent owner and implementer of standard cannot agree on licensing terms, patent owner must enter binding arbitration to determine royalty rate, and implementer must make similar commitment on its standard-essential patents) [read post]
