Search for: "State of Kansas v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2009, 2:11 pm
Details of the complaint and proposed consent decree in U.S., State of Missouri, and State of Nebraska v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:46 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Fortunately, the United States Treasury changed its rules in 2014. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The cover art and subtitle suggest that the narrative is centered on United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
United States, Nos. 07-693L, 07-675L (Feb. 27, 2009) - more rails-to-trails takings - certifying questions of abandonment under Kansas law to the Kansas Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
Southern Kansas R. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/ Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:06 am
Theresa Barr (former ADO) won in State v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
According to the Illinois Republican, there had been a conspiracy among four “workmen” of the Democratic Party to nationalize slavery in the United States, which had culminated in Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
Clinton, 48 M.J. 84 (C.A.A.F. 1998), and United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
The court recognized that the Kansas state government could not constitutionally suppress our client’s boycott to silence one side in the public debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Connex-Metalna Management Consulting GmbH, 302 F.3d 358, 365 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States, currently pending in the U.S. [read post]
