Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 421 - 440
of 23,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2010, 11:35 am
I haven’t read the full opinion yet, and I’m not sure whether I’ll have the time to post much about it, but I thought I’d note it. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:25 am
Interesting case.6-25-2010 Indiana:Although state law allows police to request identification from passengers inside a car that they’ve stopped, two Indianapolis officers shouldn’t have arrested a man for refusing to identify himself when there was no reasonable suspicion he’d done anything wrong.The Indiana Court of Appeals addressed that issue in a six-page opinion today in Adam Starr v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:13 am
See, e.g., McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
Georges Decocq, Sur les sentences déclaratoires Antonio Crivellaro, The Failure to State Reasons in ICSID Awards [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:24 pm
(D. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:08 pm
Dep't of Labor (W.D. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:32 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 7:50 am
But at the very least, Kennedy's argument suggests that the state could take the lesser step of requiring doctors to inform the woman about all the details of the D&E procedure she will have to undergo and about what will happen to the fetus.If that is correct, then Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:55 am
Chamilia, LLC (D. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
In Londona v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 6093782 (D. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:31 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
In Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:42 pm
All of a sudden, you’d have the State of Connecticut, the defense, and the victim advocate all acting in cross-purposes maybe. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:23 am
Sometimes you just can’t win. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:51 am
Defendants also point to Praluent's label stating that "[t]he recommended starting does for Praluent is 75 mg. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:59 pm
(Will Baude) While I am reprising themes from prior posts, I thought I would also note that the Fifth Circuit heard argument today in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Strong AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
