Search for: "State v. Black"
Results 421 - 440
of 9,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2010, 11:51 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:58 pm
[Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Ricci v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:21 am
Ct. 1332 (2022), to examine the absence of privacy for poor families, particularly poor Black, Latinx, and Native families, in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm
In Cajune v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
EMA, concerning the constitutionality of state regulation of violent video games, and McComish v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
Buckley and how civil rights lawyers attacked the state action requirement in Shelley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:06 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 1:03 pm
” The case is Williams v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court recently held in Timbs v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:13 am
The Board began by citing the oft-cited decision in Jacobs v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Just ask Conrad Black: Conrad Black v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 4:06 pm
United States of America), and on February 3rd the Court will issue its judgment in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 7:28 pm
In two cases, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued rulings emphasizing the rights of defendants to cross-examine prosecution witnesses regarding evidence of their racial or ethnic bias.In Brinson v Walker (--- F.3d ----, 2008 WL 4890153 [2nd Cir 11/13/08])the court granted habeas corpus relief and vacated a New York state robbery conviction whee the New York trial judge precluded the black defendant from presenting evidence (both through cross examination and by… [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:33 am
Case citation: Cisneros v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
The Court rejected the state’s argument that the statute was legitimate because it applied equally to both blacks and whites and found that racial classifications were not subject to a “rational purpose” test under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 2:07 pm
" In Smith v. [read post]
