Search for: "State v. Constant"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Godoy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:13 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
To borrow Justice Blackmun's memorable phrase, it was the federal courts' constant tinkering with the machinery of death that caused the delay, not violations of existing rule by the state courts. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:06 pm
Case Name: Blakely v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 4:52 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:49 am
” Here’s an edited version of the opinion and an example of Hand’s stellar rhetoric: Many people believe that possession of unchallenged economic power deadens initiative, discourages thrift and depresses energy; that immunity from competition is a narcotic, and rivalry is a stimulant, to industrial progress; that the spur of constant stress is necessary to counteract an inevitable disposition to let well enough alone. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:44 am
See State of New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:15 pm
David Stockman likely has the financial wherewithal to continue to pay his attorneys, although even his personal fortune may not be enough if the current billing levels remain constant. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:49 am
Brennan v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:50 am
Hansen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:42 pm
See Roe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am
Security Treaty, which requires constant coordination and the joint assessment of situations of concern in order to achieve “seamless, robust, flexible, and effective bilateral responses. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Sugano, which states (in the context of a constructive reduction to practice in an interference) that "envisioning" an invention may not be sufficient (see, Goeddel v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Sugano, which states (in the context of a constructive reduction to practice in an interference) that "envisioning" an invention may not be sufficient (see, Goeddel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize marriages of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:51 am
[An insightful point from oral argument in National Pork Producers v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
However, a review of the authorities led to the inexorable conclusion that there was a clear and constant line of Strasbourg jurisprudence which (per Lord Kerr, at [48]): “[e]stablish[es] that the state is obliged under art 3 to conduct an effective investigation into crimes which involve serious violence to persons, whether that has been carried out by state agents or individual criminals. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:59 pm
Superior Judge John Munter emphasized in his ruling in Luquetta v. [read post]
