Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 421 - 440 of 8,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 5:04 pm
  The report is available at this link, and here is how it is described: In response to a suggestion in a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:01 am by Eric Goldman
Plaintiffs argue that because Defendants have failed to show that a predicate takedown notice was made under the DMCA, Defendants cannot sufficiently state a claim for a violation of Section 512(f). [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am by Jay Yurkiw
E-discovery costs Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]