Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Later Discovery of an Outstanding Arrest Warrant Does Not Remove Taint from an Illegal Stop

15 Jun 2011, 7:46 am by Wendi Overmyer, N.D. Ohio

In United States v. [read post]

Sixth Circuit Blog - http://circuit6.blogspot.com/

239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001)

5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec

B. [read post]

Nick Woolridge, Esq. Blog - http://www.nylitigationfirm.com/blog

U.S. Supreme Court, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P., Docket No. 22-1165

13 May 2024, 3:42 pm

Morgan Stanley, 776 F. 3d 94, 101 (CA2 2015) (“Item 303’s affirmative duty to disclose in Form 10–Qs can serve as the basis for a securities fraud claim under Section 10(b)”), with In re Nvidia, 768 F. 3d 1046, 1056 (CA9 2014) (“Item 303 does not create a duty to disclose for purposes of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b–5”); see also Oran v. [read post]

Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/

United States Supreme Court Holds that Class Action Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Need Not Prove the Materiality of the Alleged False Statements or Omissions to Support Certification of a Class, Resolving Circuit Split

7 Mar 2013, 9:45 am

Litig., 639 F.3d 623 (3d Cir. 2011); Schleicher v. [read post]

Corporate Securities Law Blog - http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/

Probation office contact with probationer's employer to verify employment status does not constitute occupational restriction on probationer

26 Feb 2007, 10:02 am

STATUTORY CONSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]

Direct Appeal - http://directappeal2.blogspot.com/

Schuster v. SLM Corporation (U.S.D.C.)

4 Dec 2017, 6:58 am

Spaulding v. [read post]

Maryland Business Law Developments - http://marylandbusinesslawdevelopments.blogspot.com/

S.D.N.Y. Notes Split Re Whether Defendant Classes are Permissible in Class Actions under Rule 23(b)(2)

27 Aug 2007, 6:53 am

Co., 2 F.3d 1023 (10th Cir.1993) (affirming certification of a(b)(2) defendant class); Baker v. [read post]

Split Circuits - http://splitcircuits.blogspot.com/

Ex rel. DR. PETER ROST v. PFIZER, INC., and PHARMACIA CORPORATION, CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-11084-PBS

2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am

Rost v. [read post]

THE PHARMA LAW BLOG - http://peterrost.blogspot.com/

Murder committed in national forest in Oklahoma falls within federal jurisdiction

28 Feb 2008, 5:07 am

JURISDICTIONUnited States v. [read post]

Direct Appeal - http://directappeal2.blogspot.com/

The Impact of TC Heartland: Motion to Challenge Venue Waived Where Defendant Failed to Bring Motion with Other Rule 12(b) Motion

13 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm by Stan Gibson

Co. v. [read post]

Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/

Venue in Multi-District States

23 Oct 2017, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch

La. 1984) (Under 1400(b), “venue is proper under section 1400(b), in any judicial district in its state of incorporation”; expressly refusing to follow Action Comm.); Brynes v. [read post]

Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent

Case o' The Week: Ninth Tuts Hut Scuttlebutt - Wells and FRE 404(b) Evidence

7 Jan 2018, 4:24 pm by Steve Kalar

“[United States v.] [read post]

Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/

When a sex offense is not a “sex offense”: plain error to apply career sex offender enhancement; categorical approach controls analysis of state law prior convictions

7 Sep 2016, 10:51 am by The Blog Team

United States v. [read post]

The Federal Criminal Appeals Blog - http://www.federalcriminalappealsblog.com/

Limelight Networks v. Akamai Tech.: SCOTUS Finds Induced Infringement First Requires Direct Infringement

2 Jun 2014, 9:40 am

[…]Limelight Networks, Inc. at *4-5 (some internal citations omitted).271(f)(1) and §271(b)Section 271(f)(1) reinforces our reading of §271(b). [read post]

Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society - http://jptos.org

CAFC tackles estoppel, royalty rate in XY v. Trans Ova

24 May 2018, 12:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert

Arizona v. [read post]

IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/

Subscriber information provided to internet service provider is not protected by Fourth Amendment privacy expectation

14 Apr 2008, 4:10 am

SEARCH & SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]

Direct Appeal - http://directappeal2.blogspot.com/

Pro se Appellant Burnett loses in a 12(b)(6)/101 case

17 Jul 2018, 6:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert

Monroe v. [read post]