Search for: "State v. Howell"
Results 421 - 440
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Howell v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Howell details the lessons to be taken from a recent case, Patco Construction Company v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:32 am
The case is Texas v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:01 pm
We would applaud even louder if they would fix Howell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
How high is revealed by the New York State Court of Appeals in Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 121 [1993) Howell arose against the backdrop of the Hedda Nussbaum story, which made tabloid headline news in 1988. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
How high is revealed by the New York State Court of Appeals in Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 121 [1993) Howell arose against the backdrop of the Hedda Nussbaum story, which made tabloid headline news in 1988. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Howell. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:22 pm
In Howell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:17 pm
It is expected that SB 1528 will be amended with provisions that would nullify the California Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Howell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
” State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Holding of United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 6:10 am
Howell can be read at Howell v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case is Howell v State of Illinois/Menard Correctional Center, (09 WC 39531, issued March 20, 2012). [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., avoiding the Christopher v. [read post]
