Search for: "State v. Levinson"
Results 421 - 440
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2008, 9:10 pm
Sentence Affirmed: In United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:13 pm
We will affirm.US v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President . . . would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
” Basic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:49 am
In conversation Sandy Levinson has impressed on me several curious features of the Second Amendment right of self-defense recently recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
But here the interpretation in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
In Bush v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:30 am
Law Offices of Barry Levinson v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:11 am
Part V concludes with the problem of false constitutional necessity.This is the final published version of constitutional possibilities! [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
" A sad state of affairs.It's not quite evident to me why, on the merits, Posner's name would be prima facie evidence of decline. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
" A sad state of affairs. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 1:18 pm
FWIW, my own suggestion for other highly influential state law cases besides Van Gorkom, in the comments section, was Aronson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Rev. 481, 481 (2005), stating that the issue has been labeled an "Armageddon" by some and a "salvation" by others. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
Sandy Levinson is first up. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 12:06 pm
Democrats were very upset at Bush v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
Bush's innovations as he or she continues the development of the National Surveillance State. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
Ackerman has distinguished his theory from Sandy Levinson's and my partisan entrenchment theory precisely on the grounds that we do not sufficiently recognize the decisive significance of movement parties in constitutional revolutions. [read post]
