Search for: "State v. Mai X."
Results 421 - 440
of 3,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2022, 9:44 am
App’x 43, 47–48 (2d Cir. 2017), as well as t [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:32 am
The written description states that a skilled artisan may use well-known antibody engineering techniques to transform the resulting antibody into different structural formats. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 10:13 am
” [v] Iowa Code § 144C.5; Kirksey v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 2:27 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 9:17 am
White, III v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Ratification advised by the Senate of the United States of America on May 27, 1970. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
The Supreme Court of the United States today decided United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm
I'm also a bit worried that Congress may not adopt the Open App Markets Act as we're approaching the end of the legislative term, and there is a risk of some Senators and United States Representatives preferring not to hold the decisive vote shortly before the Epic v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
In Teva v. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 3:16 pm
In Duran-Peralta v Luna, 2017 WL 6596632(S.D. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:33 pm
You can read more about these later developments to the character in Siegel v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
X, one may say, is no George Kennan, if you understand the allusion. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
May 18, 2012)), Kansas (Spears v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
App'x at 84 (custodian). [read post]
