Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 421 - 440
of 19,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The distinctive dog deviceAzumi Ltd v Zuma's Choice Pet Products Ltd [2017] EWHC 609 is a case about a dog's purpose. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Compevo AB v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
In New Breed of Patent Claim Bedevils Product Makers , DIONNE SEARCEY covered aspects of the false patent marking issue found in the Federal Circuit case Stauffer v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:04 am
For publication opinions Oct. 19 (1): In State of Indiana v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:55 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
In Wickard v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm
Research In Motion Limited v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 11:52 am
[2] State Indus. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am
") (internal quotation marks omitted); Zuckerman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
’s rights in the famous mark BARBIE were not enough to for our Supreme Court to find a likelihood of confusion with a restaurant operating under the name Barbie’s (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22). [read post]
2 May 2018, 5:16 pm
The post State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), because a False Marking qui tam relator is not an inferior officer of the government, but rather, is an assignee of a revocable interest of the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:20 am
See Peloro v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
See, e.g., Burden v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:33 pm
/NOTICE OF FILINGCOMES NOW the State of Florida, and files the following:1.Berry v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:57 am
On Friday, November 13th, join judges, prosecutors, and attorneys as they convene to mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case of Sheppard v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
MoveOn.org also argued that its use of a modified version of the service mark was strongly protected because it was an expressive use for non-commercial purposes and that the service mark belonged to the State of Louisiana, which was the target of the parodic use. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:23 pm
(thetakeaway.org) Events to mark 60 years since Topeka’s Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
