Search for: "State v. Simmons"
Results 421 - 440
of 794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Grutter v. [read post]
Court declines to block execution of Missouri man who says his conviction was tainted by racial bias
23 Nov 2022, 8:46 am
The Supreme Court held in Roper v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 5:04 pm
Simmons. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:09 pm
Simmons is via Oyez. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:15 pm
Simmons, in which the court abolished the juvenile death penalty. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 12:50 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:06 pm
United States, 941 F.2d 1488, 1492-1493 (11th Cir.1991); Simmons v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
Simmons, expressly limited to capital punishment, and Graham v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:20 am
Simmons, 2005). [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 3:37 am
The state of play in the UK courts Q1: Did the Aldi product take unfair advantage of the reputation of the Thatchers mark? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
Simmons v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am
James and Cynthia Simmons. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
The doctrine applies “where the issue in the second action is identical to an issue which was raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action, and the party who is being estopped had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the earlier action” (Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, 112 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Molnar v JRL S. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm
The state Supreme Court upheld the sentence, concluding that the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:26 pm
Emboldened by the Supreme Court's Roper v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:51 am
Simmons, noting that a majority of the states did not permit execution of persons who’d been juveniles when they’d committed the crime. [read post]
