Search for: "State v. Sing" Results 421 - 440 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am by Kathy Kapusta
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court wrote that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm by Old Fox
A MOJWA spokesman stated that 40 MNLA troops had been taken prisoner.[8][9]The MNLA's Azawad Vice President Mahamadou Djeri Maïga acknowledged that they lost control of the city but said that the fight would continue. [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am by Ritika Singh
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:11 am
Sandie Shaw sings  "(There's) Always Something There to Remind Me" on YouTube here Naked Eyes version here [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:08 pm by CAPTAIN
  In his "Non-Kumbaya" Order, he stated: "The court does not expect the parties to hold hands and sing ‘Kumbaya’ around a campfire beside the Medina River. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:21 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)In his pun-filled, 10-page decision in Lee v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:05 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Not surprisingly, these companies are singing the praises of drug testing to curious lawmakers, while relishing the business boom that has accompanied this pernicious and unconstitutional trend. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]