Search for: "State v. Watts"
Results 421 - 440
of 521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Watts, No. 07-2462 In an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 alleging that the defendants' failure to supervise resulted in arrests without probable cause, illegal warrantless searches, and use of excessive force, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to establish that the actions of defendants amounted to supervisory encouragement, condonation or acquiescence, or gross negligence amounting to deliberate indifference. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:02 am
Case C-420/07, Apostolides v Orams [2009] ECR I-0000, para. 66). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:47 am
For example, in a 1969 case, Watts v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
As was stated in Re P(DM) v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
Watts’ article Tyranny by Proxy: State Action and the Private Use of Deadly Force was cited in the following article: Darrell A. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
Watts is the Garvey Schubert Barer Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development at the University of Washington School of Law. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Rehnquist (who clerked for Justice Jackson), to the ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Acevedo v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm
Implied, but insufficiently stated in the article, is the fact that the “mindfulness technology” was invented by humans, in order to address a perceived market for tools to help resist distractions. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
United StatesCNN v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
“There should be a clear legal recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism,” Zelenskyy said. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
Watts, 260 S.W.3d 582, 585 (Tex. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The state supreme court construed the Supreme Court's post-Apprendi case law to permit a high-end sentence upon proof of facts to a judge by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 9:36 am
Beck gave a CLE presentation to the Lubbock Area Bar Association titled “United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
