Search for: "Supervisors v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 1,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
., Federal Judge with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta issued a lengthy ruling in a closely watched Americans With Disabilities Act case. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:04 am by Lisa Whittaker
Ball State University (which we blogged on here), the United States Supreme Court finished employees off with the 5-4 decision in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
The case was remanded for further proceedings.Read More: Appeals court rules Oklahoma license plate suit has meritUnited States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Richard S. Zackin
In a recent case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Lupyan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm by Howard Friedman
Summary dismissal of a suit charging discrimination based on sex and religion for failure to state a claim.Village of Bensenville v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[McGunigle v City of Quency, USCA, First Circuit, Docket # 15-2224.] [read post]