Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 421 - 440
of 304,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In decision T 222/85 [4], the board held that the requirement in R 55(c) was only satisfied if the contents of the notice of opposition were sufficient for the opponent’s case to be properly understood on an objective basis, from the point of view of a reasonably skilled man in the art to which the opposed patent related.[2.3] Regarding the extent to which the European patent is opposed, the [opponent] on page 1 of the notice of opposition as well as on page 2 of Form 2300,… [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 3:16 am
Low-T is a term created by the marketing arm of drug companies intended to mean a person has a lower than average testosterone count. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
The opponent omitted to pay this fee, which triggered a notification of loss or rights under R 112(1). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
As regards (ii), the board considers that “for reasons of equity” indicates that some circumstances of the case call for an apportionment different from the normal régime and, as indicated by the case-law (see generally “Case Law”, 6th edition 2010, pages 740 to 763), this means costs should be awarded against a party which can be held to have caused another party unnecessary expense that could have been avoided with normal care or by compliance with… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Such a retroactive identification may also obviate the need for a formal authorisation (see also T 850/96 [3.3]). [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The concept of purposive selection is explained in T 0198/84 (Thiochloroformates) (see r. 7) and T 0279/89 (r. 4.1).However, the third criteria of purposive selection seems to have dropped from favour in recent years. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
J 20/85, [4(a)] and J 3/90) and is intended to ensure that the parties to the proceedings are not taken by surprise by grounds mentioned in an adverse decision (cf. inter alia T 669/90; T 892/92; T 594/00 and T 343/01, see “Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 5th edition 2006, VI.B.1, page 322). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:44 pm
The latest issue of the Journal du Droit International ("Clunet") (Vol. 147, no. 3, Juillet-Août-Septembre 2020) is out. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 7:11 am
"Die Beschwerdegegnerin bemängelt [...] das erstmalige Vorbringen im Beschwerdeverfahren der im Einspruchsverfahren bisher nicht vorgelegten Druckschrift[] D9 [...] [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 1:10 pm
“Trump Judges Won’t Be Biden’s Highest Legal Hurdle; Democratic and Republican jurists will both insist that the benefits of new regulations outweigh costs and that their impact won’t be too disruptive”: Law professor Cass R. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
Die Bundesanwaltschaft (BA) hat gestern Ihren Tätigkeitsbericht für das Jahr 2011 veröffentlicht. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The definition of the catalyst is found in page 4, lines 5 t 6 of the original description: “The catalyst of the process according to the invention contains a support, platinum and at least one further element. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:21 am
Vous pouvez également lire, écouter ou regarder :Une réforme en vue pour le régime fiscal des sociétés de personnes Consultation publique sur l’Internet du futur [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:01 pm
,R-1 such that g.c.d {qj,p-1} = 1 and qj > 6, qj > q(j-1) for each j = 1, 2, ... [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:00 am
According to a LiveCareer survey, a majority of jobseekers can’t capture transferable skills on their résumés or identify how their skills apply to other industries, and they are not comfortable speaking with potential employers about those skill sets. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:59 am
The excellent 'Nouvelles du monde’, 'Au fil des revue', and 'Repères'--both Anglophone and Francophone--of the European Network on Law and Society (Réseau Européen Droit and Société) are now available. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
Under R 100(2) (corresponding to A 110(2) EPC 1973 in conjunction with R 66 (1) EPC 1973) the board shall invite the parties “as often as necessary” to file observations. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:14 am
t? [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:00 am
Principle of equity underlying R 6(3)[2.3] The appellant supports that the “principle of equity underlying R 6(3)” should allow for a remedy in the present case. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Under these circumstances, the OD was not entitled to deal with the appeal and the arguments and facts presented together with the statement of grounds in appeal case T 111/12 were not part of the opposition proceedings. [read post]
