Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE" Results 421 - 440 of 3,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn, 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Blackburne, 87 N.Y.2d 660, observed that a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration,. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:51 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm by James Romoser
ShareMind-reading police officers, guns made of marshmallows, and a Woody Allen mockumentary all made rhetorical appearances during Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Interpreting contract language Local 589 v Cuevas, 271 AD2d 535 Using clear and unambiguous language in a collective bargaining agreement makes it easier for a court to resolve the meaning of a Taylor Law contract provision. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:00 am by John Day
    The trial court declared the arbitration agreement unconscionable pursuant to the Tennessee Supreme Court's decision in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
Summary dismissal during a disciplinary probation periodWilliams v NYSOMH, 259 AD2d 623Disciplinary charges were filed against Henry Williams, an employee of the New York State Office of Mental Health, alleging that he was guilty of excessive absenteeism.The disciplinary action was settled when Williams agreed to serve a disciplinary probation period during which period he could be terminated “without recourse to Article 33 of the State-CSEA Agreement [a negotiated… [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:08 pm
  The outcome of the case made him precisely as happy as he appears in this photo.Sharon Taylor et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
As support for this conclusion, the Court referred to the plain and ordinary meaning of "complaint", how workplace safety laws have been interpreted in other states, how the federal workplace safety law has been interpreted and finally to a prior decision by the Kentucky Court of Appeals, Terminix Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” The Appellate Division ruled that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement agreement: intoxication on the job.________________________ The Discipline Book, - A concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State set out in a 2100+ page e-book. [read post]