Search for: "Thomas v. United States Department of Housing "
Results 421 - 440
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
He then appealed, arguing that inobtaining the incriminating images from his computer, the police violated his rights under the 4th Amendment. . . .The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, `The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. . . . [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:41 am
Today, the Supreme Court decided Department of Transportation v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
Is it about combatting residential segregation to achieve a more integrated set of living patterns across the United States? [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
The jury didn’t buy it, and Elonis was convicted after a trial in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Without further ado: Argument by the Appellant At bottom it’s the government’s appeal, so the United States lawyer Thomas Byron opens. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:28 am
Those presidents and their State Departments believe that they must do everything they can not to tip off those in the region that the United States government is now siding with Israel’s claim to sovereignty over Jerusalem, instead of remaining neutral. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm
More importantly, it was reportedly frustration with the British resolution of 1785 authorizing the Department of Foreign Affairs to open and inspect any mail related to the safety and interests of the United States that led James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe to write to each other in code.In fact, in the 1999 decision throwing out the government’s export regulations on encryption in EFF’s case Bernstein v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 am
Whelan, in Flax v Shirian, 2014 NY Slip Op 51229(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County Aug. 15, 2014], the court mercifully decreed death for a hopelessly dysfunctional, multi-member real estate holding company identified by one side as 27th Street Associates, LLC, by the other side as 27th Street, LLC, and in the property deeds and records of the New York Department of State, as 27 Street LLC. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
That investigation is also far more complex in the United States than a look at the organization of its government might suggest. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:12 pm
This is intended to limit the effect of Thomas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
The Washington Post indicates that the House’s proposed Email Privacy Act now has the support of 220 cosponsors and the Justice Department. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
