Search for: "Townes v. Young"
Results 421 - 440
of 615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 4:50 am
The case, Mitchell v Mitchell, holds that a Mother's refusal to abide by a family court's ruling to provide a background check on her live-in boyfriend is "just cause" to modify custody. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:45 am
The case, Mitchell v Mitchell, holds that a Mother's refusal to abide by a family court's ruling to provide a background check on her live-in boyfriend is "just cause" to modify custody. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 3:23 pm
" Phase one begins with Bush v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
We see Beckett v Verlander, and then Lester v Doug Davis. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:17 am
Town of Jackson (Wyo. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Hegwood v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:30 am
Aja Conrad is a member of the Karuk Tribe of California and comes from Somes Bar, a unique town in the northern California wilderness. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
Avenue Extension north of County Home Road, east of the town of Robins rolled several times. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:21 am
It also enumerates the pressures on Marshall, who was simultaneously working on arguments for Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Bubak, 643 F.3d 1137, 1141–42 (8th Cir.2011) (rejecting relative benefit testimony and suggesting in dictum that absolute benefit “is the measure of a drug’s overall effectiveness”) Young v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:06 am
The atrocities committed included the destruction of the Rumuekpe town between 2005 and 2008 and the deaths of 60 people. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:02 am
Young lawyers tried subrogation cases every week in the General District Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:45 am
In Story v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court to rule in Magner v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:25 am
Under these circumstances, there was no pending action in which to intervene, and the motion should have been denied in its entirety by the Supreme Court (see CPLR 1012, 1013; Carnrike v Youngs, 70 AD3d 1146; Rectory Realty Assoc. v Town of Southampton, 151 AD2d 737; 176 E. 123rd St. [read post]
