Search for: "U. S. Patent Office" Results 421 - 440 of 705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 12:07 pm by Marina Chafa
  Until recently, these international trademark applications were filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) by non-US based companies through their foreign lawyers or through a corporate representative. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
Advocacy organizations, scholars, and minority groups worried that these decisions opened the floodgates to the United States Patent and Trademark Office registering the vilest and most prejudicial terms in the U.S. lexicon, ossifying hatred. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Victoria VanBuren
Bills that passed: Patent Reform Act of 2011 (a.k.a. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
Patent and Trademark Office, ci-après USPTO), a annoncé qu’il envisageait d’introduire une nouvelle procédure d’examen dite « multivoies » (multi-track examination). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:42 am
They include a new cognitive assistant called “U” or “Unity,” which is a tool that is intended to allow patent examiners, through a single-click, to conduct a “federated search” across patents, publications, non-patent literature, and images and through AI and machine learning-based algorithms, which would then present to the examiner the results in the form of a “pre-search” report. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:48 am by Jason Rantanen
They look at renewal data in the patent office to help value portfolios. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:10 am by Victoria VanBuren
Bills that passed: Patent Reform Act of 2011 (a.k.a. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:55 pm
The first is the European Patent Office's blog here. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Rader dissented:“Silence alone will not create an estoppel unless there was a clear duty to speak or somehow the patentee’s contin- ued silence reinforces the defendant’s inference from the plaintiff’s known acquiescence that the defendant will be unmolested. . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
The Examiner referred to MPEP 2173.05(u) , which directed the Examiner to reject a claim as indefinite when a trademark was used to identify a product. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
The Examiner referred to MPEP 2173.05(u) , which directed the Examiner to reject a claim as indefinite when a trademark was used to identify a product. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:57 am
Duffy, in Rethinking the Prospect Theory of Patents, 71 U. [read post]