Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 3:08 am
” International Finance Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Lateef v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:18 am
On the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck dove deep on a different Guantanamo detention case: Hamdi v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
Blue Coat Sys., Inc., 879 F.3d 1299, 1303 (Fed. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:02 am
Local use of the mark since 1979;2. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:23 am
New York v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:55 am
Coates v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:17 am
Ltd v Aiwa Corp. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:02 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
CSL argues that Midsun sells silicone-based coating products and uses names that are similar to those used by CSL. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:52 am
["Mann v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:04 am
See Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:36 am
Innocuous, even potentially pleasant objects, such as perfume, water, or a coat, were also available to be used. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
Andrew Kent provided his thoughts on the recent briefing in the cross-border shooting case, Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am
: Cour d’Appel Paris decision in Teva v Eli Lilly (Kluwer Patent Blog) US: CAFC confirms that isolated DNA may be patented: Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:03 pm
“A simple joke in your telling lifts us all, albeit often with groaning. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
The possibilities of combination multiply considering the hues used for the main body of the puck differed from that used for the pull tags.Having reviewed the evidence, the judge reached the conclusion on the balance of probabilities that:The Trade Mark could be capable of distinguishing only if a particular hue of red used on the main body of the product is associated with FBSA’s cheese. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:23 am
He believed this coating was consistent with marijuana use and asked the defendant when he had last smoked marijuana. [read post]
