Search for: "USA v. Cross" Results 421 - 440 of 743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Ramoutar, 2014 ONSC 1954 http://t.co/GQ2xOSk42s -> Link to CBC. v SODRAC case http://t.co/oFqyjv7eYl -> Apple lawyer to jury: Samsung “crossed into the dark side” http://t.co/o1Yo0oNHKV -> Light the Cat Signal: Did Google Ask the Feds to Arrest Android Hackers? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
For instance in Aviva USA Corp. v Vazirani, 902 F Supp 2d 1246 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
For instance in Aviva USA Corp. v Vazirani, 902 F Supp 2d 1246 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
For instance in Aviva USA Corp. v Vazirani, 902 F Supp 2d 1246 (D. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For my discussion of the Goodyear case, read my February 6 discussion in USA v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
In an August 15, 2013 ruling, Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the cross motions for partial judgment of plaintiff L'Oreal USA, Inc. and defendant Trend Beauty Corp. in L'Oreal's action alleging Lanham Act and state law claims against Trend Beauty. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:42 am
  But this did not assist HTC either, not least because it was held not to apply where the sale was outside the USA, and in this case the sale had taken place in Taiwan. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 1:01 pm by Sheryl Allenson
 In another big win for employers, a district court in Nebraska granted JBS’s Rule 52 motion for judgment after trial on Phase 1 of EEOC litigation on behalf of Muslim employees claiming they were denied time for prayers required by their religion, in EEOC v JBS, USA, LLC. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:34 am by Joy Waltemath
In what is likely to be viewed as a big win for employers seeking to defend religious discrimination claims, a federal district court in Nebraska granted an employer’s Rule 52 motion for judgment after trial on Phase I of EEOC litigation on behalf of Muslim employees claiming they were denied time for prayers required by their religion (EEOC v JBS USA, LLC, D. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
If the party against whom the statement was admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party may examine the declarant on the statement as if on cross-examination. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
  At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn discusses the grant in Harris v. [read post]