Search for: "United States, et al. v. Lowe, et al." Results 421 - 440 of 486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm by Schachtman
Although the United States Supreme Court attempted, in Daubert, to draw a distinction between the reliability of an expert witness’s methodology and conclusion, that Court soon realized that the distinction is flawed. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 12:38 pm by Drew Falkenstein
The Florida Department of Health, CDC, public health and regulatory officials in several other states, and the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity and… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity and… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
There is a long history of pirate websites locating themselves outside of the United States but marketing themselves to U.S. users in a deceptive manner that makes it difficult for consumers, including both consumers and brands, to distinguish an illegitimate site from a legitimate one. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm by Stefanie Levine
  The United States Supreme Court explained this rationale in the nineteenth century case, Rude v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” Likewise, in The World Bank Comparative International Study of Court Performance Indicators, A Descriptive and Analytic Account, Buscaglia et al. state: “[t]here is a growing awareness that a judiciary able to resolve cases in a fair and timely manner is an important prerequisite for economic development. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Inherent in this process is recognition that a lexical unit is functioning as a referent and not as a description. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:16 am by Amy Hogan-Burney, George Ramsey
Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit works to protect Microsoft and its customers from digital threats. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
§ 1125(a)) Relief for Unfair Competition Under California Business And Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]