Search for: "United States v. All Funds on Deposit"
Results 421 - 440
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 5:26 am
The Tax Court described the second transaction as follows: On February 29, 2000, in exchange for all 100,000 CRFLP partnership units, decedent transferred to CRFLP a 30-percent interest in Malkin I, a 50-percent interest in Malkin II, a 99-percent interest in Malkin IV, and a 50-percent interest in Malkin V. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:54 am
In amending § 2B 1. 1, the United States Sentencing Commission stated it intends the . . . enhancement `to apply in cases in which mass-marketing has been used to target a large number of persons, regardless of the number of persons who have sustained an actual loss or injury. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:20 am
The Bankruptcy Code, which is codified as title 11 of the United States Code, is the uniform federal law that governs all bankruptcy cases. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
You can always walk away for your deposit. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
Committee Comments Effective December 1, 1997 In Cantu v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
Yet a highly effective mechanism exists for recovery of funds to the United States Treasury while simultaneously providing a significant economic incentive for the person who files suit. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm
A jury convicted Flores on all counts. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:54 pm
The spreadsheet ledgers and Buyers Transaction Log do not show the purchase price of the unit (an essential factor in determining the appropriate amount of funds assigned to each purpose) nor do they distinguish funds to the reservation deposit, protected deposit or construction deposit. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:00 pm
How to make a payment People sending a payment should make the check out to "United States Treasury" and should enclose it with, but not attach it to, the tax return or the Form 1040-V, Payment Voucher, if used. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:40 am
And yet, it typically is more difficult to obtain personal jurisdiction over foreign companies in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:02 pm
We agree with many of the Proposed Regulations and believe they serve important investor protection functions, however we are concerned that some of the Proposed Regulations will not protect investors and will have a deleterious effect on the United States forex industry. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
In favor of the State &/or Warden (Notable) United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
State Bank of India, Bagpat, Distt. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
