Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest" Results 421 - 440 of 2,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
Constitution assigns exclusively to Congress the power to transform an inchoate title to property otherwise held by the United States into a perfect title. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled today that white firefighters who were denied a promotion even though they scored higher on tests than minority counterparts, suffered violations of their civil rights. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States, 2002   “[The patent system] added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius in discovery and production of new and useful things. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:51 am by Sever | Storey
New London, a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in 2005. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Notably, Title VII overtly permits employers, with a specific statutory exclusion, to fire an employee if the employee is a member of the Communist Party of the United States or affiliated with a Communist-front organization. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
All Records confirming, disconfirming, acknowledging, or otherwise discussing whether there is systemic racism within SLSD in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Co., 414 U.S. 86, 93 (1973) (interpreting the term “national origin” in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and discussing the term as it relates to ancestry, but not United States citizenship or alienage). [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The word mark “WINNING ISN’T NORMAL” has also been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office with Registration No. 4630749 for printed matter. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
This panel decision essentially abdicates judicial review of a race-conscious admissions program for undergraduate University of Texas students that favors two groups, African–Americans and Hispanics, in one of the most ethnically diverse states in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Greenhouse writes:It has been nearly three months since the court “invited” — that is to say, ordered — Solicitor General Elena Kagan to “express the views of the United States” on whether laws that take away the right to vote from people in prison or on parole can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act as racially discriminatory.The order came in a case from Massachusetts, Simmons v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by David Hart QC
And anyway, where do the human rights in my title – those under Article 1 of Protocol 1 to ECHR, or the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions – come into this story? [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:58 am by Daniel Richardson
  Typically, in rem cases carry quirky captions like In re 948 Acres, State of Vermont v. $2,465 in United States Currency, or United States v. 40 Kilograms of Cocaine. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
A third notable cert denial came in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by SHG
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]