Search for: "United States v. Cole" Results 421 - 440 of 569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 11:37 am by Jim Singer
The United States Supreme Court has accepted for review a new patent case that will determine what burden of proof is required to challenging a patent’s validity in court. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Citizens United was the example. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Yesterday, the panel of Judges Martin, Cole, and Clay decided United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:30 am by David G. Badertscher
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Erred in Applying 18-Level Enhancement in Re-Entry Case United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:28 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Engelbrecht, Educator rights and duties in special education — a comparative study b etween the United States and South Africa [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am by Jeff Gamso
In a per curiam opinion (that either means one that nobody wants to admit to having written or it means that the panel wants to emphasize that it is speaking with one voice) Judges Martin, Boggs fergodssake, and Cole hold that police need some justification before breaking down the door and entering a private residence.The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:35 am by David Freedman
  United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole, however, denied that motion, holding that parties seeking native format production must explicitly demand that in their discovery requests. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Lyle Denniston
   “The Clerk of Court,” the judge wrote, “is directed to file a copy of this order on the docket and forward this order to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  But by treating "houses of worship" as the units from which to sample, a disproportionately heavy representation of Christians is the inev [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
   [8]Foodborne illness outbreaks are obviously not associated with weddings only in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:51 am by Erin Miller
In response to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
” In The Hill, David Cole, who represented the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On January 21, in its first decision of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]