Search for: "United States v. Container Corp"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
This decision is notable for its application of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) pleading standard, as clarified by the United States Supreme Court in BellAtlantic Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm
In United Therapeutics Corp. v Liquidia Tech Inc., the Federal Circuit reviewed the district court’s decision on invalidity and infringement of two pharmaceutical patents and the impact of the Final Written Decision (FWD) in a parallel inter-partes review (IPR) upon the district court’s decision. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:32 am
Hilton Hotels Corp., 2004 U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:51 am
Sevidal v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Damages were at issue in this installment of the CAFC review of the omeprazole litigation:Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc., and TorPharm Inc., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am
” In that case, the court discerned a grant of jurisdiction in a charter that authorized the Red Cross to “sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am
Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am
Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Promega Corp., 323 F.3d 1354, 1359 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:09 am
” Id. at 59-60 (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500, 511(1988). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Indeed, as far as I am aware U.S. courts have only granted anti-suit injunctions in global FRAND-disputes on two occasions: Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:05 pm
Murphy Oil USA, Case No. 16-307, Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
In Countrywide Financial Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
Bombardier Inc.Evidence: Disputes arose between Union Carbide Canada Inc. and Bombardier Inc. in Quebec and the United States over gas tanks on personal watercraft; Bombardier claimed the tanks, which were supplied by Union Carbide, were unfit for normal use. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
On Wednesday, February 21, 2007, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 05-1056, Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 11:43 am
Taniguchi v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm
(Argentine Republic v Amerada Hess Shipping Corp, 488 US 428) Plaintiffs relied on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
