Search for: "United States v. Earth" Results 421 - 440 of 907
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm by Florian Mueller
Two weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held a hearing on the damages award and underlying liability issues in the first Apple v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 8:29 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (3d Cir., Dec. 12, 2014), the 3rd Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's claim that a correctional officer's pat down search of his genital area violated his free exercise rights because his religion prohibits homosexual activity.In Goninan v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm by Schachtman
Rosner and Markowitz then hone in on one sentence in Hirth’s presentation, where he criticizes the: “shyster lawyer and quack doctor, who have been with the United States always, but whom we hope we may someday exterminate. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Whereas his previous work did an admi- rable job of depicting how the historical trans- formation of ownership in the United States was aided by the process of measuring and recording, he has expanded his range here into a somewhat unmanageable though always interesting tract. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm by Bill Otis
 Last I looked, the Sixth Circuit, for example, was saying that all its sister circuits had rejected it, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and rainey Reitman
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:51 am by Stefan Passantino
  What is not obvious to all is whether the United States Supreme Court will agree that anyone can be forced to abide by such restrictions consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
Then along came Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46 on 23 July. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]