Search for: "United States v. Nixon"
Results 421 - 440
of 841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
(I noticed, when checking for additional facts, that George Washington Law Professor Orin Kerr has blogged on this subject, and he located federal cases with even closer factual situations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
(I noticed, when checking for additional facts, that George Washington Law Professor Orin Kerr has blogged on this subject, and he located federal cases with even closer factual situations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Likewise, the only one of President Nixon's appointees to recuse in United v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am
It is black-letter law, under United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Humphrey … with intent to subvert the authority of the Government of the United States, to hinder and delay the due execution of the laws of the United States, and to oppress and injure citizens of the United States, did unlawfully act as judge of an illegally constituted tribunal within said State, called the district court of the Confederate States of America, and as judge of said tribunal … then and there… [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:39 am
The case, New York Times v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:34 am
First, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court overturned their convictions, in McDonnell v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
In parts of the United States, back alley abortions would then have remained common, and lunch counters segregated.But to Republicans today, defeating Bork was the original sin. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Nixon, President of the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
