Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 421 - 440 of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
For example, if the applicant abandons an application more that one year after the first public use or sale in the United States or the first publication of the invention, all rights to the invention in the United States are effectively abandoned because the application cannot be refiled. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (07-330), involving appellate judges’ ability to increase sentences sua sponte, and Irizarry v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ct. 2448 (2018).The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissed Plaintiff's complaint and she appealed, contending that "the district court erred by prematurely dismissing her claims against the unions for, among other things, failing to adequately plead state action. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ct. 2448 (2018).The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissed Plaintiff's complaint and she appealed, contending that "the district court erred by prematurely dismissing her claims against the unions for, among other things, failing to adequately plead state action. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
”The Appellate Division affirmed the decision of Supreme Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez granting the United Federation of Teacher Local 2’s motion for summary judgment dismissing Santiago’s complaint.* The federal National Labor Relations Act does not cover public employees in New York State. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Relations Bd. v County of Monroe, 2009 NY Slip Op 51908(U), Decided on August 28, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Henry F. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:17 am by admin
” An estimated 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants live in the United States, according to 2023 Pew Research data. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
Taylor, 401 S.C. 104, 108, 736 S.E.2d 663, 663 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2013).State v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
Madison stated: “By the constitution of the United States, the president is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character and to his own conscience. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling.The Appellate Division said that Plaintiffs had noted “the obstacle” to their cause of action in view of the Court of Appeals’ decision in Martin v Curran, 303 NY 276,* but contended the so-called Martin rule was abrogated by the enactment of the Taylor Law in 1967** or by its 1990 amendment codifying the so-called Triboro Doctrine.In Palladino v CNY Centro, Inc., 23 NY3d 140, explained the… [read post]