Search for: "United States v. US Currency" Results 421 - 440 of 711
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 7545, preempts a state-law tort award that imposes retroactive liability on a manufacturer for using the safest, feasible means available at the time for complying with that mandate. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am by SHG
  And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:13 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In the United States, the Supreme Court recognized the relationship between anonymity and freedom of speech and association in NAACP v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Of these “fixes,” the most commonly used one is computed at 4:00 pm by a joint venture between State Street’s WM unit and Thompson Reuters (Thompson Reuters was also involved with setting the Libor rates).9] However, at least one recent article discussed potential investigations into “Tokyo fixing”, referring to Japanese currency benchmarks (which are set at 9:55 each morning in Tokyo).[10] The potential attempted… [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Gelman does not report what diseases were involved in the 17 claims, arising out of the Paterson factory that used mostly amosite asbestos from South Africa. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm by Ken White
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Newsflash: Brazil spied on the United States, among other countries, about a decade ago. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:44 am by Raffaela Wakeman
” Military Judge James Pohl, who is overseeing the key military commission cases, has set the date for the trial in United States v. [read post]