Search for: "United States v. United Technologies Corp."
Results 421 - 440
of 1,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Section 271(e)(1) states that it “shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention … solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
This decision collaterally overrules the Federal Circuit's prior case law in Air Measurement Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:52 pm
Corp., 659 F.3d 1142, 1149 (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
United States and Moda Health Plan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:26 am
Hypersonic Technologies Corp. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:02 am
Dish Network Corp., 951 F.3d 1359, 1363–1364 (Fed. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
See e.g., Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
United Technologies Corp. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:02 pm
The justices’ second argument this morning was WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Corp., a case that requires the justices yet again to consider Section 271 of the Patent Act. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Under United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Smith Corp., 521 U.S. 179, 191 (1997), citing Connors v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:35 pm
Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
And when the Supreme Court granted review in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:47 am
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Corp. [read post]
