Search for: "Unknown Persons or Claimants" Results 421 - 440 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
 AAA plc & Ors v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 2529 (QB) (20 September 2021), Pepperall J granted an interim injunction to restrain allegations of fraud made by an attempted blackmailer. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 3 March 2020 there will be a trial in the case of JQL v NTP, listed for 4 days Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Canada Goose Retail v Persons Unknown. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
  During 2011, claimants showed an “increased willingness” to include advisors as class action defendants. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Laura Heymann made this argument a while back: what kinds of works are worth protecting, can be engaged w/as commodities rather than experiences—by a person who is more consumer than audience. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
A recent request to the ICO under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) has revealed that, from the available data, of the 21705 personal data breaches notified to the ICO since May 2018, 14,365 were notified within 72 hours, and 7340 were not – meaning that approximately one third of personal data breaches are reported later than within 72 hours. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The system would launch next month and would be aimed at catching serious criminals and tracking down missing persons. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
Six Unknown Named Agents might offer a path for judicial remedies for unlawful conduct has largely been eviscerated, with Kennedy’s opinion for the court in Ziglar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Posted by Justia: Weekly Opinion Summaries – Labor and Employment LawWeekly Summaries Distributed October 3, 2010Solis v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
Are the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases about employee health insurance plan coverage of contraception, writ large, or—as the plaintiffs in those two cases would have it—“only” about coverage of “abortifacients,” or about four discrete forms of birth control? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The difference between the two causes of action can be critical, as John Terry found to his cost: Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  The defendants’ attempts to strike out the claimant’s harassment claim was unsuccessful. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by Law Lady
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- No abuse of discretion in ordering sequestration of rents -- Lack of standing is affirmative defense to foreclosure, and trial court should refrain from conclusively ruling on affirmative defenses in ruling on motion to sequester rentsTIDEWATER ESTATES CO-OP, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, and all other unknown parties including claimants, persons or parties, natural or corporate, or whose… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 11:32 am by Blue Blog
  Historically, Georgia’s lien laws (and similarly Georgia’s law on payment bonds) allowed virtually anyone working on the project to be a potential lien or bond claimant. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by INFORRM
  If the third party publishes the information he is potentially guilty of a criminal contempt for undermining the purpose of the interim injunction (see for example  X and Y v Persons Unknown [2006] EWHC 2783 (QB)). [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 10:05 am by Michael Ehline
Here are some of them: Claimants’ Assertions Are Invalid or Overstated Many people are not well-versed with the laws related to ca [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm by Law Lady
., and MARY ANN PADOT, his wife; ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, OR AGAINST THE HEREIN N [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
Other news In the case of Appleyard v Wilby, the claimant was awarded £60,000 libel damages by Bean J after default judgment had been entered in respect of defamatory blogs and tweets. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s possible to argue that trademark is a First Amendment-free zone, as copyright basically is except for the internal restraints of the fact/expression division and fair use, but that argument seems unlikely to prevail as easily with trademark and trademark registration, neither of which are mentioned in the Constitution and the latter of which confers rights unknown at common law. [read post]