Search for: "Unpublished Disposition" Results 421 - 440 of 486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm by David
How did someone with his disposition and skill set become an entertainment superstar, of all things? [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They’re unpublished works; the users are minors; there isn’t an optout; they’re using the whole thing; there’s a market harm (!). [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:46 am by Alexander A. Reinert
Schwartz’s pathbreaking study of district courts suggests that qualified immunity is rarely dispositive in Section 1983 litigation brought for alleged Fourth Amendment violations. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
In subsequent years I have seen the Schindler formulation quoted on numerous occasions in published and unpublished decisions. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
After years of study, Marin County adopted an Ordinance in 2011 banning single-use plastic bags and mandating a 5-cent fee on single-use paper bags; the ordinance applies to roughly 40 retailers in the unincorporated county. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
In light of the disposition of the Obama Administration, Snowden has been on the run and seeking exile since his first leak. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
She moved for summary disposition and the trial court granted her motion, finding that (I) the child was conceived during the marriage and (2) there was no court determination that the child was a child born or conceived during the marriage but is not the issue of that marriage. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
At pages 121-123 of Innovation and Its Discontents (Jaffe and Lerner), there is text:An illustration of the difficulty of proving that an invention is obvious is the 2002 decision, In re Lee, which revolved around a technology at the very heart of the American way of life: the television remote control [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (In the lengthy, unpublished portion of its opinion, the Court of Appeal went on to hold that appellant SSE failed to exhaust its administrative remedies on numerous issues, including its challenges to: the EIR’s use of a 5-year average/2009 actual production baseline; alleged insufficient mitigation for oak removal/loss of carbon sequestration impacts; alleged deficient water use baseline and mitigation; and water quality impact analysis. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (In the unpublished  part of the opinion, the Court held Petitioner had alleged sufficient facts to overcome Respondents’ statute of limitations argument for purposes of demurrer, that the case was not shown to be moot on the basis of the record before the Court, and that Petitioner had failed to show the trial court erred in denying its motion to compel production of documents pursuant to requests the trial court had found overbroad in scope.) [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Fresno (5th Dist. 2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 596, 598, 601-605 [affirming order dismissing CEQA action where request for hearing filed one day late and before motion to dismiss; portion of opinion affirming denial of discretionary relief under CCP § 473 was unpublished]; compare also Nacimiento Regional Water Management A [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
In the next breath, however, plaintiffs set forth an unpublished statistical analysis (by Dr. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:47 pm by Lindsay A. Heller
Natanson is unpublished (not precedent setting), but still an important read on the topic in terms of what the court considered that will likely be considered in future cases as they start to be decided. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But those arguments should still be remembered, if only as cautionary tales. [* * *] Tomorrow: How can we make sense of the line between punishable lies and unpublishable lies. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (In the unpublished portion of its opinion, which won’t be further discussed in this post, the Court of Appeal held the trial court was correct in finding that substantial evidence supported a fair argument that the project may have a significant impact on the beetle, thus requiring an EIR, and also concluded the trial court did not err in upholding the County’s determinations that the project was consistent with the Williamson Act and County’s zoning code.) [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The unpublished portion of the opinion, which also won’t be further discussed here, rejected Appellants’ arguments that the project failed to meet the City Zoning Code’s open space requirements, and that the City’s “nondetriment” findings inadequately addressed alleged emergency vehicle access and related fire hazard concerns.) [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The unpublished portion of the opinion (which won’t be further discussed in detail) held that the City’s statement of overriding considerations was supported by substantial evidence, did not need to “describe in detail the weight accorded to the various aspects of the agency’s balancing of competing public objectives,” and did not need to include findings “reconciling” the project approval with the CIty’s rejection of an earlier,… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
  The Eleventh Circuit, in an unpublished opinion, held that Lane was not testifying as a citizen on a matter of public concern, and thus could not stake out a First Amendment retaliation claim. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
The claim invited a defense motion to dismiss, which was granted by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Elizabeth Hazlett Emerson in an unpublished May 2010 decision (read here). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
This is Utah: "Unpublished decisions of the COA issued on or after 10/1/1998 may be cited as precedent. [read post]