Search for: "WILSON v. GOING" Results 421 - 440 of 1,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2017, 9:37 am by First Mondays
District of Columbia, a fun case about time limits (trust us), and Wilson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm by Steve Vladeck
” The question the justices will consider next Monday in Wilson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
Shamoun declined involvement in the RICO case, but agreed to assist Hill in working towards a "global resolution" 775*775 because Shamoun knew Hill did not want to go to trial in May. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Schachtman
Affinia Group, 2016‐Ohio‐2830, ¶ 37, 54 N.E.3d 174, 182; In reJames Wilson Assoc., 965 F.2d 160, 173 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:35 am by John Jascob
The group recommended the Supreme Court’s definition of materiality outlined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The contrast with the cool and measured approach (unlike, it is accepted, this post) of Lords Kerr and Wilson in their minority judgment is notable. [read post]