Search for: "Weekes v. Gay"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In today’s column, the first in a two-part series, we begin to analyze and assess an important decision handed down last week by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concerning discrimination against would-be jurors who happen to be gay or lesbian. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 9:30 pm
Apple’s Map App "Tying" Could Raise Antitrust Concerns http://t.co/ahMOJv4p 09:06:13, 2012-10-06 Court Doesn't Buy DOJ's Argument For Why Megaupload User Can't Sue To Get His Data Back http://t.co/HhfnvZx2 19:25:11, 2012-10-05 RT @mashable: Everything You Need to Know About Apple v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
” Gunter argued that the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:47 pm
Second, Prop 8 backers argue that Baker v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:44 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:03 pm
She said those states include Indiana and Illinois.See Mariga v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:41 am
NYCERS v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 12:05 pm
Zarda and Bostok v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
” No same-sex marriages will take place today or tomorrow or this week. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
After two days of impassioned debate and weeks of contemplation, the benchers of the Law Society of Upper Canada have voted not to accredit Trinity Western University’s proposed law school because of its Christian community covenant, which bans gay sex.In an opposite move to their counterparts at the Law Society of British Columbia, LSUC benchers voted 28-21 to reject TWU’s bid. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm
This week’s revelations include that the justices originally considered granting only gay, but not transgender, employees civil rights protection in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:19 am
What person who holds similar views to Schlafly about the role of women, about creationism v. evolution, about gay rights, etc., would not be similarly objectionable as a recipient of an honorary degree? [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:01 pm
Highlights this week included: Infamous antipiracy lawyer, Andrew Crossley gives up, abandons P2P cases (ArsTechnica) (1709 Blog) (TorrentFreak) (IAM) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:08 am
The Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 12:42 pm
[Varnum v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
In that case, Baker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Supreme Court this morning heard oral arguments in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
