Search for: "Weinstein v Weinstein"
Results 421 - 440
of 857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
McCullock v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 9:08 am
The Court then reaffirmed its interpretation of the CDA by distinguishing Ben Ezra Weinstein & Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
See Mata v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
See Mata v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:15 pm
Judge Weinstein was “required” to intervene on behalf of the pro se plaintiff in Floyd v.... [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 2:42 am
At New Private Law, Tony Sebok discusses Judge Jack Weinstein's ruling in G.M.M. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:14 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., July 27, 2015, Weinstein, J.). [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
” Hall v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Congratulations to Deputy Federal Public Defender Michael Weinstein of the Central District of California.The decision is here: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/07/01/12-55041.pdf Bastidas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am
Sorkin, and Gail Weinstein. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Circuit’s decision in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul alerted us to the Supreme Court’s pending decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm
The conversation around EEOC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
Kreimer, Nadine Strossen, and James Weinstein, and the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment (and written by my students Jeremy Kauffman, Michael Schwartz, and Samuel Sazer and me): Like Reed v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:05 am
Sorkin, and Gail Weinstein. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:45 am
According to the 6th Circuit in Wheat v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:23 am
Subsequently, in Graham v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am
., Appellants, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:53 am
This precise situation, also involving a dispute about how authors were listed, was considered by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 1987 in a case called Weinstein v. the University of Illinois, and the panel of judges, two of whom were themselves well-known academics, came to the same conclusion — no infringement when one co-owner of the copyright publishes without permission from the others. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:53 am
This precise situation, also involving a dispute about how authors were listed, was considered by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 1987 in a case called Weinstein v. the University of Illinois, and the panel of judges, two of whom were themselves well-known academics, came to the same conclusion — no infringement when one co-owner of the copyright publishes without permission from the others. [read post]
