Search for: "White v. Director" Results 421 - 440 of 2,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by Unknown
.), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, submit a report to the Chair of the White House Competition Council, enumerating and describing any relevant concerns of the Department of Agriculture and strategies for addressing those concerns across intellectual property, antitrust, and other relevant laws. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by Unknown
.), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, submit a report to the Chair of the White House Competition Council, enumerating and describing any relevant concerns of the Department of Agriculture and strategies for addressing those concerns across intellectual property, antitrust, and other relevant laws. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
He explained the situation this way: first, Enron had Directors and Officers insurance which covers legal fees when a Director or an Officer has been accused of some sort of wrongdoing. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 11:06 am by Christopher J. Willis
  Evidence of communications that would have discouraged reasonable people on a prohibited basis from applying to the lender for a mortgage loan included: (1) direct marketing materials that only featured models appearing to be non-Hispanic white, (2)open house marketing materials that only included headshots of mortgage professionals appearing to be non-Hispanic white, and (3) locating nearly all offices in majority non-Hispanic white areas. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 11:55 am by Amy Howe
He explained that last year’s decision on the CFPB director, Seila Law v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
David KaplanHani FarahIn a recent post (here), David Kaplan of the Saxena White P.A. law firm and Lane Arnold, a Senior Director – Legal at the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO), discussed the Catch-22 in which the court’s rulings in the Valeant securities class action opt-out cases had put prospective securities suit opt-outs. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
The anti-commandeering doctrine originated in the 1842 Supreme Court case Prigg v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm by Giles Peaker
The applicants had established no consent, connivance or neglect on the part of Mr White as director. [read post]