Search for: "Windsor v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Holland & Hart
Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act last year in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 7:46 am by Joy Waltemath
., will pay $7.5 million to resolve a suit by an employee who claimed the retail giant refused to provide the same health insurance benefits to her same-sex spouse that it extends to opposite-sex spouses, even after the Supreme Court’s landmark United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:12 pm
The case that made it to the Supreme Court which ultimately led to its overturning is United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court's Windsor decision to uphold a state law banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:10 pm
Historically, states have had authority to regulate marriage and issues relating to the family. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Perry, a challenge to California’s controversial Proposition 8 measure, and a case out of New York, U.S. v Windsor, which considers the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Since the SCOTUS decisions in United States -v- Windsor and Hollingsworth -v- Perry last summer, the civil rights push for same-sex marriage equality has picked-up momentum throughout the country. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm by Sam Ritchie, ACLU
Just a few weeks after a fantastic piece outlining the struggle for marriage rights – and quoting the ACLU LGBT Project’s very own James Esseks – the New York Times today published an editorial in support of our challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, Windsor v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:50 am by crush
The Supreme Court may have thought that it dodged deciding the issue of state gay marriage bans when it avoided the merits of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
” The Windsor decision and these new pieces of related guidance reflect the evolving nature of marriage and family increasingly incorporated into federal and state employment and employee benefit law. [read post]