Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 7,219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 3:13 am
At the time of the publication of the regulations in December 2012, the Department of Health’s Director for Nutrition explained that exclusive breastfeeding rates in South Africa is at an all-time low of 8% and infant mortality rates stand at 40 per 1,000 live births. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: R (Hodkin & Anor) v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages; and R (Edwards & Anor) v Environment Agency & Ors. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
JoAnn Smith, et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
The case, Stewart v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
After the birth of the child in 2007, Jennie selected the name “Hayden,” to which Jennifer agreed. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Chan ruled that, accepting the allegations as true for the purposes of HASA’s motion to dismiss Doe’s action, HASA’s purposeful use of masculine pronouns in addressing plaintiff, who "presented as female" and the insistence that she sign a document with her birth name despite the court-issued name change order is laden with discriminatory intent. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
The SCt has the most experience with this, applying it in a number of settings from its birth under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Burrage v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jerome Augutis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Farah v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Tenenbaum, The Union of Contraceptive Services and the Affordable Care Act Gives Birth to First Amendment Concerns, (Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 539, 2013).Frederick Mark Gedicks & Pasquale Annicchino, Lautsi v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
In Skelly-Hand v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
R (Hodkin & Anor) v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages, heard 18 July 2013 R (Edwards & Anor) v Environment Agency & Ors, heard 22 July 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
R (Hodkin & Anor) v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages, heard 18 July 2013 R (Edwards & Anor) v Environment Agency & Ors, heard 22 July 2013. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
The plaintiffs claimed that the defendant failed to detect significant abnormalities that may have caused the birthing complications. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
(Indeed, you are required by law to get it—or perhaps not exactly required, see NFIB v. [read post]
