Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 21,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a requirement that the winner be… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:56 am
Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-26.State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
A. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court listened to the oral arguments in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:56 am
In a ghoulish and deeply disturbing decision, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Albrecht v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:10 am
Tseming Yang and Robert V. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 3:48 am
Patentology has a nice summary of the innovation patentee’s successful appeal in Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:43 pm
In Cine SK8, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
In Carl v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm
These sources clearly show that a “recess” took place only between the formal sessions of a legislative body. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:03 am
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal's ruling in Greenberger v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 11:06 am
Hall v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:44 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 11:06 am
Hall v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 12:57 pm
International bodies, it said, cannot confer individual rights on people facing an American court. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
In Palermo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:52 am
In-N-Out Burgers v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
The court explained that a contract that is not approved by the relevant municipal or governmental body as required by law, rule, or regulation may be ratified by the municipality or government body by its subsequent conduct. [read post]
