Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 2:37 pm
On March 29, 2013, the Court in Lake County Sanitation Dist. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:33 am
It is set to go into effect on June 1, 2017. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:03 am
This does not seem to give much time to consider such far-reaching proposals. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:55 pm
” No. 17-1726, ECF No. 73, slip op.at 1 –2. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Kevin Emerson CollinsFor the Innovation Law Beyond IP 2 conference, March 28-29 at Yale Law School My project follows through on an intuition about the value of architectural copyright that dates from my days as an architect before I went to law school. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
29 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
A mother gets a DVRO (domestic violence restraining order) against her (allegedly) very-drug-abusing 29-year old son who still lives with her. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:14 am
Does “know how“ need to be patentable ? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:26 am
It is true that unlike Article 15(1)(c), Article 5(3) makes no mention of directing activities. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:54 am
Ranks et Vasiļevičs is a case concerning two Latvian nationals who are alleged to have sold copyright-protected Microsoft software on an online marketplace between 29 December 2001 and 22 December 2004 (see also here). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:26 pm
(p.29) I got a strong sense that this perception was, at bottom, what drove the outcome in this case. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
It asked the following questions, one of these concerning the applicability of the Directive ratione temporis and four the interpretation of substantive provisions: 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
Key Precedent 29 U.S.C. 203(e) (Fair Labor Standards Act defines employee as meaning any individual employed by an employer.) 29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1) (Fair Labor Standards Act does not apply minimum wage requirements to “any employee employed…in the capacity of outside salesman. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
Id. at *29 (text added). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
29 May 2023, 5:01 am
It does so. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
But how does this practical guidance relate to the way we might conceive of an ethical duty to use technology competently? [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:15 am
No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 35 U.S.C.). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 35 U.S.C.). [read post]
