Search for: "J. L. B." Results 4381 - 4400 of 5,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2007, 1:00 pm
   (b) This state has previously recognized the importance ofprotecting the confidentiality and privacy of an individual'spersonal information contained in identification documents such asdrivers' licenses. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:16 am by Chukwuma Okoli
(b) Whether the law of the foreign court applies and, if so, whether it differs from Nigerian law in any material respects. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial in Stocker v Stocker was heard by Mitting J on 29 February, 1 and 2 March 2016 with judgment being given on 3 March 2016). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:59 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Contemporáneamente, y la opinión del Tribunal es una manifestación de ello, hemos cedido el espacio público basados en una seudolibertad y en búsqueda, principalmente, de seguridad. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 6:25 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Y Clinton me preguntó si yo podía hacerlo porque él sabía de estas cosas y porque esa labor era natural para la directora de presupuesto. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:37 am by Colby Pastre
(b) Most of Birmingham is located within Jefferson County and is subject to a 10 percent sales tax. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm
Nesse mesmo sentido votaram os ministros Luiz Fux, Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha, Ricardo Lewandowski e Ayres Britto. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
After all of the complicated arguments in the wage/penalty debate, future points and authorities regarding the issue can now be boiled down to a single sentence and citation: The "additional hour of pay" due to an employee under Labor Code § 226.7 is a wage, not a penalty. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
Conversely, “if I do not buy this house I can a) buy the one on Maple Street, b) extend my current lease c) move in with Mom, or d) rent the apartment down the block” gives the buyer much more flexibility and therefore much more bargaining strength. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [12] So says the Restatement Second of Torts Section 388. [13] The restatement, in its comments, further goes on to specifically address subsection (b) of Section 388 by stating that "[i]t is not necessary for the supplier to inform those for whose use the chattel is supplied of a condition which a mere casual looking over will disclose, unless the circumstances under which the chattel is supplied are such as to make it likely that even so casual an inspection will not… [read post]