Search for: "Jackson v. State" Results 4381 - 4400 of 6,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by Jon Hyman
We're doing DEI wrong — via Business Insider Can states legally ban "woke" training in the workplace? [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 2:25 pm
Another day in our modern Supreme Court on Tuesday, as the argument in A.J.T. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" While this ruling is meant for district judges, if you handle cases in federal court and summary judgment motions are a part of your life, you should also read it.The case is Jackson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 11:38 am by Kristen Matteucci
For example, the framework established for analyzing whether the President has the power to act in a particular case is “a three-part analysis articulated by Justice Robert Jackson in his concurring opinion to the Supreme Court’s decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
That was the question the Sixth Circuit had to answer in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerard Magliocca, buoyed by the ACA surviving a second Supreme Court review in King v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Jackson Women’s Health, seems at first glance to be originalist because it relies so much on history, but it is not. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Factoid: Autumn Jackson, who allegedly tried to blackmail Bill Cosby several years ago by threatening to reveal her being his out-of-wedlock child, had her conviction reversed because the judge didn’t instruct the jury about this principle, but the court of appeals later reversed the reversal, because it concluded that the error was harmless, since there was no evidence that Autumn Jackson was just asking for what was rightfully owed her; the above quote is from that case,… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Factoid: Autumn Jackson, who allegedly tried to blackmail Bill Cosby several years ago by threatening to reveal her being his out-of-wedlock child, had her conviction reversed because the judge didn’t instruct the jury about this principle, but the court of appeals later reversed the reversal, because it concluded that the error was harmless, since there was no evidence that Autumn Jackson was just asking for what was rightfully owed her; the above quote is from that case,… [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
Yoo and LaCroix commented on how that executive order squares with a Supreme Court decision that shaped modern understanding of presidential power— Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]