Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
In the words of Lord Justice Bean, “the Court was not, as we read the judgment, purporting to lay down any particular limitations on that power [to retain communications data], as opposed to conditions of access”. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:44 am
., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
In the first place, Article 7 of Directive 2006/24 does not lay down rules which are specific and adapted to (i) the vast quantity of data whose retention is required by that directive, (ii) the sensitive nature of that data and (iii) the risk of unlawful access to that data, rules which would serve, in particular, to govern the protection and security of the data in question in a clear and strict manner in order to ensure their full integrity and confidentiality. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 6:51 am
“Judge disqualified for unusual conflict prior to bench” — “Justice Cameron Moore stepped away from the Greensill Bank AG v Insurance Australia Limited proceedings after concerns were raised about his involvement in the matter prior to his appointment. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:29 am
I've gotten some ribbing from lawyers because of my representation of the defendant in Stern v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
Ultimately, the goal is to make a dispute understandable to a lay person. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 11:03 am
In Starke v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:13 am
In Reiss v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:06 pm
Network v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:20 am
Rubinstein posts about a New York Supreme Court decision, Finkel v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am
” On Wednesday, the Supreme Court examined this clause during oral argument in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 5:05 am
From yesterday's decision in Jacoby v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:59 am
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is a bit different from the typical Supreme Court arbitration case. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:17 am
From the trial court decision in the case, Davis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
Ultimately, the goal is to make a dispute understandable to a lay person. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
On Monday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Barton v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:26 pm
Ted Sichelman, University of San Diego School of Law As Patently-O has described in several posts (here, here, here), the Supreme Court is poised to decide the fate of the patent exhaustion doctrine in Impression Products v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:37 am
The May 8, 2019 Court of Appeals opinion in Klein v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm
During its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Commonwealth Edison Co. v. [read post]
