Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 4381 - 4400 of 12,242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
One big one is that people think the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(See also this Guardian article: “AI can tell if people are gay or straight with one photo of their face“.) [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
It took me until years into the profession to find law books with pictures, and color and to see the law and the real people it affected. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:11 am by Jani Ihalainen
In looking at the trademark's reputation in the UK, the first limb of the test under the subsection, the judge saw that reputation in relation to the trademark only existed with the people who had bought a flagpole bearing the trademark. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm by Larry
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
Does this mean that copyright issues involving tattoos are only relevant to people living in the limelight, or can copyright also affect how ordinary people get and live with their tattoos? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
Does this mean that copyright issues involving tattoos are only relevant to people living in the limelight, or can copyright also affect how ordinary people get and live with their tattoos? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]