Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS" Results 4381 - 4400 of 12,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm by Stephen Page
  Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v B- where delay was used to refuse to return a child to Australia, because he was well settled in South Africa.Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v Ashmore- where delay was again used to refuse to return a child to Australia. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart in Seattle (Western District of Washington) pioneered this field with his 207-page rate-setting opinion in Microsoft v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am by Kathy Kapusta
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Fielding v Kupferman 2011 NY Slip Op 31983(U) ;July 12, 2011;Supreme Court, : 113572/07;Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:36 pm by Jon Gelman
Both the State of Florida and the State of California have utilized this tactic.Senate Bill No. 374 is step forward to help injured workers and their families. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
The matter finally landed on the CJEU's desk, which rendered their decision in late December.As a short recap, the case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL dealt with the sale of Schweppes' tonic water, for which the company owned several trademarks in many jurisdictions. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
At least since Nicholas v SSoD last year, it has become apparent that bad practice is widespread in the HCEO field. [read post]