Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 15,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909,… [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909,… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:37 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:08 am
Shroyer v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
Yesterday, in the case of Lindo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 8:24 am
State and State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:41 am
In the recent case of Flood v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 7:46 am
Dent v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 12:40 am
The case is Howard v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:22 pm
In 2002, the city of Boulder, Colorado and the California cities of Oakland, Santa Monica, and Arcata, along with members of Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, filed a groundbreaking climate change lawsuit (Friends of the Earth, Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
According to the Justice Department, the settlement is within the reaches of the public interest and provides effective and appropriate remedies for the antitrust violations alleged in the complaint, with respect to the settling defendants.On April 11, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division filed a complaint against Apple, Inc. and five of the six largest publishers in the United States for conspiring to fix the sales prices of electronic books or e-books. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
The plaintiff cites but one Connecticut decision--and research has failed to reveal any others--DeGolyer v. [read post]
7 May 2025, 9:59 am
Ghandi et al v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 6:46 pm
But the question whether the federal Controlled Substances Act is within Congress's power has been raised and settled long ago. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
"Significantly, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that [1] an employee's displeasure with a work assignment, absent an adverse impact on his or her civil service grade or title, salary or benefits, does not implicate Civil Service Law §75, citing Galatti v County of Dutchess, 64 NY2d 1163, and [2] the assignments of the detectives were within the sole discretion of "the appointing officer. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied Petitioner's application holding that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363 and Plaintiff was awarded performance of duty retirement benefits. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied Petitioner's application holding that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363 and Plaintiff was awarded performance of duty retirement benefits. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 7:37 am
This is why most cases that survive summary judgment settle. [read post]
