Search for: "U. S. Federal Government"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 5,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
If an experienced federal prosecutor and two-term magistrate judge did not read deeply enough into Rule 41 to discover and comply with the requirements of subpart (e), this error cannot be laid at the agent's feet. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:15 am
An individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including law enforcement officers. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
U. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
U. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:29 am
The panel will be hosted by David Bray, director of the Atlantic Council’s GeoTech Center and will feature Atlantic Council experts Pablo Breuer, Rose Jackson and Sara-Jayne Terp and CEO of Elevate U Bevon Moore. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
Operational Controls for Proactive Criminal Investigations *Stewart M Young (University of Wyoming) Criminal Justice 08: Adjudication and Beyond Time: Fri, Jun 8 - 10:15am - 12:00pm Place: HHV, TBA20 Session Participants: Chair: William W Berry (University of Mississippi) Ending the Failure of Finality by Federalism *William W Berry (University of Mississippi) Beyond the Civil-Criminal Binary: Contempt of Court and Judicial Governance *Nirej Sekhon (Georgia State… [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:16 pm
However, as Justice Kavanaugh explained, “[u]nder Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff ’s desire to make a drug less available for others does not establish standing to sue. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
A Little Insight Into CorpFin’s Current Thoughts on Rule 14a-8 Courtesy of Division Director Keith Higgins On Tuesday Keith Higgins, Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance, gave an insightful little talk at PLI’s Program on Corporate Governance entitled “Rule 14a-8: Conflicting Proposals, Conflicting Views“. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
A Little Insight Into CorpFin’s Current Thoughts on Rule 14a-8 Courtesy of Division Director Keith Higgins On Tuesday Keith Higgins, Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance, gave an insightful little talk at PLI’s Program on Corporate Governance entitled “Rule 14a-8: Conflicting Proposals, Conflicting Views“. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
A Little Insight Into CorpFin’s Current Thoughts on Rule 14a-8 Courtesy of Division Director Keith Higgins On Tuesday Keith Higgins, Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance, gave an insightful little talk at PLI’s Program on Corporate Governance entitled “Rule 14a-8: Conflicting Proposals, Conflicting Views“. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 10:19 pm
Justice Gorsuch did ask, “What’s ambiguous enough to trigger deference to the government? [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:29 pm
Hill, 482 U. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
Only three independent agencies, it states, seem to be governed by one person who cannot be removed for cause: “the Social Security Administration, the Office of Special Counsel, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
Manufacturer’s Excessive I-9 Documentation Triggers Discrimination Liability. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 8:01 am
Rev. 509, 537 (1994); Pierre Schlag, No Vehicles in the Park, 23 Seattle U. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
"] Under federal tax law, charitable organizations that solicit contributions in California must report to the IRS "the names and addresses of donors who have contributed more than $5,000 in a particular tax year (or, in some cases, who have given more than 2 percent of an organization's total contributions). [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
No First Amendment Right Not to Host "Requiring someone to host another person's speech is often a perfectly legitimate thing for the Government to do. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
